<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.biology-direct.com/feeds/mostaccessed/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Biology Direct - Most accessed articles</title>
        <link>http://www.biology-direct.com</link>
        <description>The most accessed research articles published by Biology Direct</description>
        <dc:date>2010-02-18T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biology-direct.com/content/5/1/12" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biology-direct.com/content/5/1/7" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biology-direct.com/content/1/1/29" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biology-direct.com/content/5/1/11" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biology-direct.com/content/1/1/19" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biology-direct.com/content/4/1/42" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biology-direct.com/content/2/1/15" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biology-direct.com/content/4/1/18" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biology-direct.com/content/4/1/14" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.biology-direct.com/content/5/1/10" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
        <extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
            <html:div style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <html:span style="font-weight:bold">
                    This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central
                </html:span>
                <html:br />
                <html:span style="font-size: 12px;">
                    It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit
                    <html:br />
                    <html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">
                        http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/
                    </html:a>
                    <html:br />
                </html:span>
            </html:div>
        </extra:info>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biology-direct.com/content/5/1/12">
        <title>Community annotation in biology</title>
        <description>Attempts to engage the scientific community to annotate biological data (such as protein/gene function) stored in databases have not been overly successful. There are several hypotheses on why this has not been successful but it is not clear which of these hypotheses are correct. In this study we have surveyed 50 biologists (who have recently published a paper characterizing a gene or protein) to better understand what would make them interested in providing input/contributions to biological databases. Based on our survey two things become clear: a) database managers need to proactively contact biologists to solicit contributions; and b) potential contributors need to be provided with an easy-to-use interface and clear instructions on what to annotate. Other factors such as &apos;reward&apos; and &apos;employer/funding agency recognition&apos; previously perceived as motivators was found to be less important. Based on this study we propose community annotation projects should devote resources to direct solicitation for input and streamlining of the processes or interfaces used to collect this input.ReviewersThis article was reviewed by I. King Jordan, Daniel Haft and Yuriy Gusev</description>
        <link>http://www.biology-direct.com/content/5/1/12</link>
                <dc:creator>Raja Mazumder</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Darren Natale</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jessica Anne Ecalnir Julio</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lai-Su Yeh</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Cathy Wu</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Biology Direct 2010, 5:12</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-02-18T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1745-6150-5-12</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Biology Direct</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1745-6150</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>12</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-02-18T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biology-direct.com/content/5/1/7">
        <title>Origin of the cell nucleus, mitosis and sex: roles of intracellular coevolution </title>
        <description>Background:
The transition from prokaryotes to eukaryotes was the most radical change in cell organisation since life began, with the largest ever burst of gene duplication and novelty. According to the coevolutionary theory of eukaryote origins, the fundamental innovations were the concerted origins of the endomembrane system and cytoskeleton, subsequently recruited to form the cell nucleus and coevolving mitotic apparatus, with numerous genetic eukaryotic novelties inevitable consequences of this compartmentation and novel DNA segregation mechanism. Physical and mutational mechanisms of origin of the nucleus are seldom considered beyond the long-standing assumption that it involved wrapping pre-existing endomembranes around chromatin. Discussions on the origin of sex typically overlook its association with protozoan entry into dormant walled cysts and the likely simultaneous coevolutionary, not sequential, origin of mitosis and meiosis.
Results:
I elucidate nuclear and mitotic coevolution, explaining the origins of dicer and small centromeric RNAs for positionally controlling centromeric heterochromatin, and how 27 major features of the cell nucleus evolved in four logical stages, making both mechanisms and selective advantages explicit: two initial stages (origin of 30 nm chromatin fibres, enabling DNA compaction; and firmer attachment of endomembranes to heterochromatin) protected DNA and nascent RNA from shearing by novel molecular motors mediating vesicle transport, division, and cytoplasmic motility. Then octagonal nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) arguably evolved from COPII coated vesicle proteins trapped in clumps by Ran GTPase-mediated cisternal fusion that generated the fenestrated nuclear envelope, preventing lethal complete cisternal fusion, and allowing passive protein and RNA exchange. Finally, plugging NPC lumens by an FG-nucleoporin meshwork and adopting karyopherins for nucleocytoplasmic exchange conferred compartmentation advantages. These successive changes took place in naked growing cells, probably as indirect consequences of the origin of phagotrophy. The first eukaryote had 1-2 cilia and also walled resting cysts; I outline how encystation may have promoted the origin of meiotic sex. I also explain why many alternative ideas are inadequate.
Conclusion:
Nuclear pore complexes are evolutionary chimaeras of endomembrane- and mitosis-related chromatin-associated proteins. The keys to understanding eukaryogenesis are a proper phylogenetic context and understanding organelle coevolution: how innovations in one cell component caused repercussions on others.ReviewersThis article was reviewed by Anthony Poole, G&#225;sp&#225;r J&#233;kely and Eugene Koonin.</description>
        <link>http://www.biology-direct.com/content/5/1/7</link>
                <dc:creator>Thomas Cavalier-Smith</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Biology Direct 2010, 5:7</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-02-04T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1745-6150-5-7</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Biology Direct</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1745-6150</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-02-04T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biology-direct.com/content/1/1/29">
        <title>The ancient Virus World and evolution of cells</title>
        <description>Background:
Recent advances in genomics of viruses and cellular life forms have greatly stimulated interest in the origins and evolution of viruses and, for the first time, offer an opportunity for a data-driven exploration of the deepest roots of viruses. Here we briefly review the current views of virus evolution and propose a new, coherent scenario that appears to be best compatible with comparative-genomic data and is naturally linked to models of cellular evolution that, from independent considerations, seem to be the most parsimonious among the existing ones.
Results:
Several genes coding for key proteins involved in viral replication and morphogenesis as well as the major capsid protein of icosahedral virions are shared by many groups of RNA and DNA viruses but are missing in cellular life forms. On the basis of this key observation and the data on extensive genetic exchange between diverse viruses, we propose the concept of the ancient virus world. The virus world is construed as a distinct contingent of viral genes that continuously retained its identity throughout the entire history of life. Under this concept, the principal lineages of viruses and related selfish agents emerged from the primordial pool of primitive genetic elements, the ancestors of both cellular and viral genes. Thus, notwithstanding the numerous gene exchanges and acquisitions attributed to later stages of evolution, most, if not all, modern viruses and other selfish agents are inferred to descend from elements that belonged to the primordial genetic pool. In this pool, RNA viruses would evolve first, followed by retroid elements, and DNA viruses. The Virus World concept is predicated on a model of early evolution whereby emergence of substantial genetic diversity antedates the advent of full-fledged cells, allowing for extensive gene mixing at this early stage of evolution. We outline a scenario of the origin of the main classes of viruses in conjunction with a specific model of precellular evolution under which the primordial gene pool dwelled in a network of inorganic compartments. Somewhat paradoxically, under this scenario, we surmise that selfish genetic elements ancestral to viruses evolved prior to typical cells, to become intracellular parasites once bacteria and archaea arrived at the scene. Selection against excessively aggressive parasites that would kill off the host ensembles of genetic elements would lead to early evolution of temperate virus-like agents and primitive defense mechanisms, possibly, based on the RNA interference principle. The emergence of the eukaryotic cell is construed as the second melting pot of virus evolution from which the major groups of eukaryotic viruses originated as a result of extensive recombination of genes from various bacteriophages, archaeal viruses, plasmids, and the evolving eukaryotic genomes. Again, this vision is predicated on a specific model of the emergence of eukaryotic cell under which archaeo-bacterial symbiosis was the starting point of eukaryogenesis, a scenario that appears to be best compatible with the data.
Conclusion:
The existence of several genes that are central to virus replication and structure, are shared by a broad variety of viruses but are missing from cellular genomes (virus hallmark genes) suggests the model of an ancient virus world, a flow of virus-specific genes that went uninterrupted from the precellular stage of life&apos;s evolution to this day. This concept is tightly linked to two key conjectures on evolution of cells: existence of a complex, precellular, compartmentalized but extensively mixing and recombining pool of genes, and origin of the eukaryotic cell by archaeo-bacterial fusion. The virus world concept and these models of major transitions in the evolution of cells provide complementary pieces of an emerging coherent picture of life&apos;s history.ReviewersW. Ford Doolittle, J. Peter Gogarten, and Arcady Mushegian.</description>
        <link>http://www.biology-direct.com/content/1/1/29</link>
                <dc:creator>Eugene Koonin</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Tatiana Senkevich</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Valerian Dolja</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Biology Direct 2006, 1:29</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2006-09-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1745-6150-1-29</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Biology Direct</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1745-6150</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>29</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2006-09-19T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biology-direct.com/content/5/1/11">
        <title>Proteome changes of Caenorhabditis elegans upon a Staphylococcus aureus infection</title>
        <description>Background:
The success of invertebrates throughout evolution is an excellent illustration of the efficiency of their defence strategies. Caenorhabditis elegans has proven to be an appropriate model for transcriptome studies of host-pathogen interactions. The aim of this paper is to complement this knowledge by investigating the worm&apos;s response to a Staphylococcus aureus infection through a 2-dimensional differential proteomics approach.
Results:
Different types of growth media in combination with either E. coli OP50 or Staphylococcus aureus were tested for an effect on the worm&apos;s lifespan. LB agar was chosen and C. elegans samples were collected 1 h, 4 h, 8 h and 24 h post S. aureus infection or E. coli incubation. Proteomics analyses resulted in the identification of 130 spots corresponding to a total of 108 differentially expressed proteins.
Conclusions:
Exploring four time-points discloses a dynamic insight of the reaction against a gram-positive infection at the level of the whole organism. The remarkable upregulation after 8 h and 24 h of many enzymes involved in the citric acid cycle might illustrate the cost of fighting off an infection. Intriguing is the downregulation of chaperone molecules, which are presumed to serve a protective role. A comparison with a similar experiment in which C. elegans was infected with the gram-negative Aeromonas hydrophila reveals that merely 9% of the identified spots, some of which even exhibiting an opposite regulation, are present in both studies. Hence, our findings emphasise the complexity and pathogen-specificity of the worm&apos;s immune response and form a firm basis for future functional research.ReviewersThis article was reviewed by Itai Yanai, Dieter Wolf and Torben Luebke (nominated by Walter Lutz).</description>
        <link>http://www.biology-direct.com/content/5/1/11</link>
                <dc:creator>Annelies Bogaerts</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Isabel Beets</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Liesbet Temmerman</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Liliane Schoofs</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Peter Verleyen</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Biology Direct 2010, 5:11</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-02-17T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1745-6150-5-11</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Biology Direct</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1745-6150</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>11</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-02-17T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biology-direct.com/content/1/1/19">
        <title>Rooting the tree of life by transition analyses</title>
        <description>Background:
Despite great advances in clarifying the family tree of life, it is still not agreed where its root is or what properties the most ancient cells possessed &#8211; the most difficult problems in phylogeny. Protein paralogue trees can theoretically place the root, but are contradictory because of tree-reconstruction artefacts or poor resolution; ribosome-related and DNA-handling enzymes suggested one between neomura (eukaryotes plus archaebacteria) and eubacteria, whereas metabolic enzymes often place it within eubacteria but in contradictory places. Palaeontology shows that eubacteria are much more ancient than eukaryotes, and, together with phylogenetic evidence that archaebacteria are sisters not ancestral to eukaryotes, implies that the root is not within the neomura. Transition analysis, involving comparative/developmental and selective arguments, can polarize major transitions and thereby systematically exclude the root from major clades possessing derived characters and thus locate it; previously the 20 shared neomuran characters were thus argued to be derived, but whether the root was within eubacteria or between them and archaebacteria remained controversial.
Results:
I analyze 13 major transitions within eubacteria, showing how they can all be congruently polarized. I infer the first fully resolved prokaryote tree, with a basal stem comprising the new infrakingdom Glidobacteria (Chlorobacteria, Hadobacteria, Cyanobacteria), which is entirely non-flagellate and probably ancestrally had gliding motility, and two derived branches (Gracilicutes and Unibacteria/Eurybacteria) that diverged immediately following the origin of flagella. Proteasome evolution shows that the universal root is outside a clade comprising neomura and Actinomycetales (proteates), and thus lies within other eubacteria, contrary to a widespread assumption that it is between eubacteria and neomura. Cell wall and flagellar evolution independently locate the root outside Posibacteria (Actinobacteria and Endobacteria), and thus among negibacteria with two membranes. Posibacteria are derived from Eurybacteria and ancestral to neomura. RNA polymerase and other insertions strongly favour the monophyly of Gracilicutes (Proteobacteria, Planctobacteria, Sphingobacteria, Spirochaetes). Evolution of the negibacterial outer membrane places the root within Eobacteria (Hadobacteria and Chlorobacteria, both primitively without lipopolysaccharide): as all phyla possessing the outer membrane &#946;-barrel protein Omp85 are highly probably derived, the root lies between them and Chlorobacteria, the only negibacteria without Omp85, or possibly within Chlorobacteria.
Conclusion:
Chlorobacteria are probably the oldest and Archaebacteria the youngest bacteria, with Posibacteria of intermediate age, requiring radical reassessment of dominant views of bacterial evolution. The last ancestor of all life was a eubacterium with acyl-ester membrane lipids, large genome, murein peptidoglycan walls, and fully developed eubacterial molecular biology and cell division. It was a non-flagellate negibacterium with two membranes, probably a photosynthetic green non-sulphur bacterium with relatively primitive secretory machinery, not a heterotrophic posibacterium with one membrane.ReviewersThis article was reviewed by John Logsdon, Purificaci&#243;n L&#243;pez-Garc&#237;a and Eric Bapteste (nominated by Simonetta Gribaldo).</description>
        <link>http://www.biology-direct.com/content/1/1/19</link>
                <dc:creator>Thomas Cavalier-Smith</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Biology Direct 2006, 1:19</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2006-07-11T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1745-6150-1-19</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Biology Direct</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1745-6150</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>19</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2006-07-11T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biology-direct.com/content/4/1/42">
        <title>Is evolution Darwinian or/and Lamarckian?</title>
        <description>Background:
The year 2009 is the 200th anniversary of the publication of Jean-Bapteste Lamarck&apos;s Philosophie Zoologique and the 150th anniversary of Charles Darwin&apos;s On the Origin of Species. Lamarck believed that evolution is driven primarily by non-randomly acquired, beneficial phenotypic changes, in particular, those directly affected by the use of organs, which Lamarck believed to be inheritable. In contrast, Darwin assigned a greater importance to random, undirected change that provided material for natural selection.The conceptThe classic Lamarckian scheme appears untenable owing to the non-existence of mechanisms for direct reverse engineering of adaptive phenotypic characters acquired by an individual during its life span into the genome. However, various evolutionary phenomena that came to fore in the last few years, seem to fit a more broadly interpreted (quasi)Lamarckian paradigm. The prokaryotic CRISPR-Cas system of defense against mobile elements seems to function via a bona fide Lamarckian mechanism, namely, by integrating small segments of viral or plasmid DNA into specific loci in the host prokaryote genome and then utilizing the respective transcripts to destroy the cognate mobile element DNA (or RNA). A similar principle seems to be employed in the piRNA branch of RNA interference which is involved in defense against transposable elements in the animal germ line. Horizontal gene transfer (HGT), a dominant evolutionary process, at least, in prokaryotes, appears to be a form of (quasi)Lamarckian inheritance. The rate of HGT and the nature of acquired genes depend on the environment of the recipient organism and, in some cases, the transferred genes confer a selective advantage for growth in that environment, meeting the Lamarckian criteria. Various forms of stress-induced mutagenesis are tightly regulated and comprise a universal adaptive response to environmental stress in cellular life forms. Stress-induced mutagenesis can be construed as a quasi-Lamarckian phenomenon because the induced genomic changes, although random, are triggered by environmental factors and are beneficial to the organism.
Conclusion:
Both Darwinian and Lamarckian modalities of evolution appear to be important, and reflect different aspects of the interaction between populations and the environment.Reviewersthis article was reviewed by Juergen Brosius, Valerian Dolja, and Martijn Huynen. For complete reports, see the Reviewers&apos; reports section.</description>
        <link>http://www.biology-direct.com/content/4/1/42</link>
                <dc:creator>Eugene Koonin</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Yuri Wolf</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Biology Direct 2009, 4:42</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-11-11T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1745-6150-4-42</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Biology Direct</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1745-6150</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>42</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-11-11T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biology-direct.com/content/2/1/15">
        <title>The cosmological model of eternal inflation and the transition from chance to biological evolution in the history of life</title>
        <description>Background:
Recent developments in cosmology radically change the conception of the universe as well as the very notions of &quot;probable&quot; and &quot;possible&quot;. The model of eternal inflation implies that all macroscopic histories permitted by laws of physics are repeated an infinite number of times in the infinite multiverse. In contrast to the traditional cosmological models of a single, finite universe, this worldview provides for the origin of an infinite number of complex systems by chance, even as the probability of complexity emerging in any given region of the multiverse is extremely low. This change in perspective has profound implications for the history of any phenomenon, and life on earth cannot be an exception.HypothesisOrigin of life is a chicken and egg problem: for biological evolution that is governed, primarily, by natural selection, to take off, efficient systems for replication and translation are required, but even barebones cores of these systems appear to be products of extensive selection. The currently favored (partial) solution is an RNA world without proteins in which replication is catalyzed by ribozymes and which serves as the cradle for the translation system. However, the RNA world faces its own hard problems as ribozyme-catalyzed RNA replication remains a hypothesis and the selective pressures behind the origin of translation remain mysterious. Eternal inflation offers a viable alternative that is untenable in a finite universe, i.e., that a coupled system of translation and replication emerged by chance, and became the breakthrough stage from which biological evolution, centered around Darwinian selection, took off. A corollary of this hypothesis is that an RNA world, as a diverse population of replicating RNA molecules, might have never existed. In this model, the stage for Darwinian selection is set by anthropic selection of complex systems that rarely but inevitably emerge by chance in the infinite universe (multiverse).
Conclusion:
The plausibility of different models for the origin of life on earth directly depends on the adopted cosmological scenario. In an infinite universe (multiverse), emergence of highly complex systems by chance is inevitable. Therefore, under this cosmology, an entity as complex as a coupled translation-replication system should be considered a viable breakthrough stage for the onset of biological evolution.ReviewersThis article was reviewed by Eric Bapteste, David Krakauer, Sergei Maslov, and Itai Yanai.</description>
        <link>http://www.biology-direct.com/content/2/1/15</link>
                <dc:creator>Eugene Koonin</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Biology Direct 2007, 2:15</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2007-05-31T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1745-6150-2-15</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Biology Direct</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1745-6150</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>15</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2007-05-31T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biology-direct.com/content/4/1/18">
        <title>Mapping the sequence mutations of the 2009 H1N1 influenza A virus neuraminidase relative to drug and antibody binding sites</title>
        <description>In this work, we study the consequences of sequence variations of the &quot;2009 H1N1&quot; (swine or Mexican flu) influenza A virus strain neuraminidase for drug treatment and vaccination. We find that it is phylogenetically more closely related to European H1N1 swine flu and H5N1 avian flu rather than to the H1N1 counterparts in the Americas. Homology-based 3D structure modeling reveals that the novel mutations are preferentially located at the protein surface and do not interfere with the active site. The latter is the binding cavity for 3 currently used neuraminidase inhibitors: oseltamivir (Tamiflu&#174;), zanamivir (Relenza&#174;) and peramivir; thus, the drugs should remain effective for treatment. However, the antigenic regions of the neuraminidase relevant for vaccine development, serological typing and passive antibody treatment can differ from those of previous strains and already vary among patients.ReviewersThis article was reviewed by Sandor Pongor and L. Aravind.</description>
        <link>http://www.biology-direct.com/content/4/1/18</link>
                <dc:creator>Sebastian Maurer-Stroh</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jianmin Ma</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Raphael Tze Chuen Lee</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Fernanda Sirota</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Frank Eisenhaber</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Biology Direct 2009, 4:18</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-05-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1745-6150-4-18</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Biology Direct</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1745-6150</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>18</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-05-20T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biology-direct.com/content/4/1/14">
        <title>Transcript length bias in RNA-seq data confounds systems biology</title>
        <description>Background:
Several recent studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of deep sequencing for transcriptome analysis (RNA-seq) in mammals. As RNA-seq becomes more affordable, whole genome transcriptional profiling is likely to become the platform of choice for species with good genomic sequences. As yet, a rigorous analysis methodology has not been developed and we are still in the stages of exploring the features of the data.
Results:
We investigated the effect of transcript length bias in RNA-seq data using three different published data sets. For standard analyses using aggregated tag counts for each gene, the ability to call differentially expressed genes between samples is strongly associated with the length of the transcript.
Conclusion:
Transcript length bias for calling differentially expressed genes is a general feature of current protocols for RNA-seq technology. This has implications for the ranking of differentially expressed genes, and in particular may introduce bias in gene set testing for pathway analysis and other multi-gene systems biology analyses.ReviewersThis article was reviewed by Rohan Williams (nominated by Gavin Huttley), Nicole Cloonan (nominated by Mark Ragan) and James Bullard (nominated by Sandrine Dudoit).</description>
        <link>http://www.biology-direct.com/content/4/1/14</link>
                <dc:creator>Alicia Oshlack</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Matthew Wakefield</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Biology Direct 2009, 4:14</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-04-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1745-6150-4-14</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Biology Direct</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1745-6150</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>14</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-04-16T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.biology-direct.com/content/5/1/10">
        <title>&apos;Genome order index&apos; should not be used for defining compositional constraints in nucleotide sequences  - a case study of the Z-curve</title>
        <description>Background:
The Z-curve is a three dimensional representation of DNA sequences proposed over a decade ago and has been extensively applied to sequence segmentation, horizontal gene transfer detection, and sequence analysis. Based on the Z-curve, a &quot;genome order index,&quot; was proposed, which is defined as S = a2+ c2+t2+g2, where a, c, t, and g are the nucleotide frequencies of A, C, T, and G, respectively. This index was found to be smaller than 1/3 for almost all tested genomes, which was taken as support for the existence of a constraint on genome composition. A geometric explanation for this constraint has been suggested. Each genome was represented by a point P whose distance from the four faces of a regular tetrahedron was given by the frequencies a, c, t, and g. They claimed that an inscribed sphere of radius r = 1/ contains almost all points corresponding to various genomes, implying that S &lt;r2. The distribution of the points P obtained by S was studied using the Z-curve.
Results:
In this work, we studied the basic properties of the Z-curve using the &quot;genome order index&quot; as a case study. We show that (1) the calculation of the radius of the inscribed sphere of a regular tetrahedron is incorrect, (2) the S index is narrowly distributed, (3) based on the second parity rule, the S index can be derived directly from the Shannon entropy and is, therefore, redundant, and (4) the Z-curve suffers from over dimensionality, and the dimension stands for GC content alone suffices to represent any given genome.
Conclusion:
The &quot;genome order index&quot; S does not represent a constraint on nucleotide composition. Moreover, S can be easily computed from the Gini-Simpson index and be directly derived from entropy and is redundant. Overall, the Z-curve and S are over-complicated measures to GC content and Shannon H index, respectively.ReviewersThis article was reviewed by Claus Wilke, Joel Bader, Marek Kimmel and Uladzislau Hryshkevich (nominated by Itai Yanai).</description>
        <link>http://www.biology-direct.com/content/5/1/10</link>
                <dc:creator>Eran Elhaik</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Dan Graur</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kresimir Josic</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Biology Direct 2010, 5:10</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-02-17T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1745-6150-5-10</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Biology Direct</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1745-6150</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>10</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-02-17T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
