Table 1 |
|||||
|
Lamarckian and quasi-Lamarckian phenomena |
|||||
|
Phenomenon |
Biological role/function |
Phyletic spread |
Lamarckian criteria |
||
|
|
|||||
|
Genomic changes caused by environmental factor |
Changes are specific to relevant genomic loci |
Changes provide adaptation to the causative factor |
|||
|
|
|||||
|
Bona fide Lamarckian |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
CRISPR-Cas |
Defense against viruses and other mobile elements |
Archaea and bacteria (present in ~1/3 sequenced genomes) |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|
|
|||||
|
piRNA |
Defense against transposable elements in germline |
Animals (apparently, all) |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|
|
|||||
|
HGT (specific cases) |
Adaptation to new environment, stress response, resistance |
Archaea, bacteria, unicellular eukaryotes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|
|
|||||
|
Quasi-Lamarckian |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
HGT (general phenomenon) |
Diverse innovations |
Archaea, bacteria, unicellular eukaryotes |
Yes |
No |
Yes/no |
|
|
|||||
|
Stress-induced mutagenesis |
Stress response/resistance/ adaptation to new conditions |
Ubiquitous |
Yes |
No or partially |
Yes (but general evolvability/ Adaptability enhanced as well) |
|
|
|||||
|
Koonin and Wolf Biology Direct 2009 4:42 doi:10.1186/1745-6150-4-42 |
|||||