Table 1 |
||||||
|
Length between motifs in elongation factors. |
||||||
|
Total sequences |
Do not have perfect match to motifs |
% of sequences that have motifs |
Length of region between motifs |
Sequences with that length |
% out of sequences with motifs |
|
|
|
||||||
|
Ef-Tu |
1013 |
12 |
98.82% |
20 |
1001 |
100.00% |
|
EF-1 |
53 |
3 |
94.34% |
20 |
50 |
100.00% |
|
EF-G |
816 |
160 |
80.39% |
20 |
367 |
55.95% |
|
24 |
13 |
1.98% |
||||
|
25 |
22 |
3.35% |
||||
|
26 |
2 |
0.30% |
||||
|
27 |
211 |
32.16% |
||||
|
28 |
12 |
1.83% |
||||
|
29 |
11 |
1.68% |
||||
|
31 |
9 |
1.37% |
||||
|
33 |
4 |
0.61% |
||||
|
35 |
3 |
0.46% |
||||
|
40 |
1 |
0.15% |
||||
|
EF-2 |
52 |
9 |
82.69% |
24 |
43 |
100.00% |
|
|
||||||
|
A summary of the length of the region between the well conserved RG(IV)T/PGH motifs. This data implies the Archaeal ancestor of EF-2 had a 4 residue derived insertion regardless of which alignment is used. |
||||||
|
Valas and Bourne Biology Direct 2009 4:30 doi:10.1186/1745-6150-4-30 |
||||||
