Comments(2)Acknowledged referenceAndrea Melendez (10 March 2008) BioMed Central To access the above referenced article please click here. Competing interests None Have something to say? Post a comment on this article! |
![]() | ![]() ![]() | Log on / register BioMed Central home | Journals A-Z | Feedback | Support | My details |
Comments(2)Acknowledged referenceAndrea Melendez (10 March 2008) BioMed Central To access the above referenced article please click here. Competing interests None Have something to say? Post a comment on this article! |
|
|
| © 1999-2010 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of Springer Science+Business Media. |
Acknowledging an earlier observation of orphan SelD
Daniel Haft (04 March 2008) J. Craig Venter Institute
Just after publication of our manuscript, we came across the following reference: Zhang Y, Romero H, Salinas G, Gladyshev VN., Dynamic evolution of selenocysteine utilization in bacteria: a balance between selenoprotein loss and evolution of selenocysteine from redox active cysteine residues. Genome Biol. 2006;7(10):R94. Epub 2006 Oct 20. We launched our study from the observation that SelD proteins explained by neither selenocysteine nor selenouridine pathways might imply a third SelD-dependent trait. The orphan status of SelD in Enterococcus faecalis and Haloarcula marismortui and possibility of SelD-dependence for selenium-dependent molybdenum hydroxylases were raised previously by Zhang, et al., and should have been cited as background to this paper. We regret having been unaware of this earlier observation.
Competing interests
none
top